@article{AllaniFrijaNemeretal.2022,
  author    = {Mohamed Allani and Aymen Frija and Rabiaa Nemer and Lars Ribbe and Ali Sahli},
  title     = {Farmers’ Perceptions on an Irrigation Advisory Service: Evidence from Tunisia},
  series   = {Water},
  volume    = {14},
  number    = {22},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  issn      = {2073-4441},
  doi       = {10.3390/w14223638},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:832-epub4-20855},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Decisions on irrigation water management are usually made at different levels, including farms, water user associations (WUAs), and regional water planning agencies. The latter generally have good access to information and decision tools regarding water resources management. However, these remain out of reach to the final water users, namely the farmers. The study, conducted in the irrigated district of Cherfech, north Tunisia, had the main objective of investigating farmer’s perceptions of, and acceptance for, the use of an irrigation advisory service (IAS) to be implemented by their WUA. The suggested IAS provides the following information: (1) reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and rainfall; (2) crop water requirement (CWR) of the most cultivated crops; (3) irrigation water requirement (IWR) of the farmer’s crop; and (4) crop monitoring and real-time estimation of IWR of crops settled, using soil moisture sensors. Such services and information would be available at the WUA level and provided in a timely manner to farmers for more effective decision making at the plot level. Prior to the acceptance study, we launched a technical study to determine the required tools and equipment required for the implementation of the IAS, followed by a farmer survey to assess their respective perceptions and acceptance towards this IAS. Results showed that only 54\% of the farmers are satisfied by WUAs work, but that 77\% of them accepted using the suggested IAS. Farmers are also willing to pay for most of the IAS packages suggested. The financial profitability of investing in the IAS at the WUA level shows the venture is financially viable, with a benefit cost ratio (BCR) of 1.018. The project will be even more profitable if we add the social benefits, which may result in water savings at the WUA level.},
  language  = {en}
}