Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (15)
- Report (7)
Language
- English (22) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (22)
Keywords
- Kölner Forschungsstelle Rückversicherung (22) (remove)
Faculty
The reinsurance market is currently faced with great challenges and profound changes. Even after the large NatCat claims in Q3-2017, the substantial hardening of the reinsurance market for which reinsurers had hoped failed to materialise in the year-end renewal. Interest is now focussed on the renewal of retrocession agreements as at 1st April 2018. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects.
In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through organisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance. Currently, there are seven researchers and two coordinating employees on the staff of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, and the employees of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
The reinsurance market continues to face major challenges – at this point we would like to outline just one of these, by way of example. The renewal of reinsurance contracts effective 1st January 2020 seems to present an-other disappointment for the reinsurance sector. This development is surprising for a substantial hardening of prices and conditions, not only in the retrocession area but also in the primary (corporate) insurance market. As a rule, a price increase in the retrocession sector is initially followed by a price rise in the reinsurance industry, which then ultimately also occurs in the primary (corporate) insurance market. Yet the trend we are currently witnessing seems to have skipped over the reinsurers. This confronts the reinsurance market with the question of whether – and, if so, when – the price adjustments will also take effect in the case of reinsurance contracts. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research pro-jects. In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through or-ganisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung], a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance. There are seven researchers, two employees responsible for research management and one administrative employee currently on the staff of the Cologne Research Cen-tre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. Within the scope of its social and environmental responsibility, this year the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance dealt with the topics of climate protection, sustaina-bility and equality. Because these topics are at once global, national and individual missions, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance developed ideas and took measures to actively practice climate protection, sustainability and equality. In this ef-fort, great importance was attached to maintaining the level of quality while at the same time pursuing the objectives the Research Centre had set for itself in the above-men-tioned areas. While it is still in its beginnings, our initiative in the field of climate protec-tion and sustainability is manifested particularly in the most sustainable management of resources and travel we can achieve.
We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, ivwKöln [the Institute of Insurance Studies Cologne] and the employees of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects. In the process, the Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. The year 2020 was dominated by the global COVID-19 pandemic. There were numerous substantial challenges that arose not just in general but also for the (re-)insurance industry in particular. Naturally, interaction and practical, bidirectional knowledge transfer at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance was also hard-hit by the many event cancellations and their makeshift relocation to online formats. We particularly regretted the cancellation of the 17th Cologne Reinsurance Symposium. The 13th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance was quite a success in the chosen online format – but of course we would like to return to the traditional event format at Clostermannshof as soon as possible. A complete success, on the other hand, with 178 participants, was the webinar series hosted by the Research Centre for Reinsurance on the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) initiative on risk mitigation techniques that could alter the effects of reinsurance under Solvency II.
There are twelve people currently employed at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. All of the personnel, material and travel costs for the Research Centre for Reinsurance are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. The special circumstances were scarcely an impediment to the research, communication and cooperation among the employees of the Research Centre for Reinsurance. As most employees do not live and work in Cologne, anyway, working from home and online had been the rule for them even before the coronavirus crisis hit. The transition to a setting working from home was (nearly) a smooth one for the other employees as well. As every year, we would like to express our appreciation to the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, and the Institute of Insurance Studies for their support of our research work.
The reinsurance market continues to face major challenges – at this point we would like to outline just one of these, by way of example. The renewal of reinsurance contracts effective 1st January 2020 seems to present an-other disappointment for the reinsurance sector. This development is surprising for a substantial hardening of prices and conditions, not only in the retrocession area but also in the primary (corporate) insurance market. As a rule, a price increase in the retrocession sector is initially followed by a price rise in the reinsurance industry, which then ultimately also occurs in the primary (corporate) insurance market. Yet the trend we are currently witnessing seems to have skipped over the reinsurers. This confronts the reinsurance market with the question of whether – and, if so, when – the price adjustments will also take effect in the case of reinsurance contracts. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research pro-jects. In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through or-ganisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung], a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance. There are seven researchers, two employees responsible for research management and one administrative employee currently on the staff of the Cologne Research Cen-tre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. Within the scope of its social and environmental responsibility, this year the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance dealt with the topics of climate protection, sustaina-bility and equality. Because these topics are at once global, national and individual missions, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance developed ideas and took measures to actively practice climate protection, sustainability and equality. In this ef-fort, great importance was attached to maintaining the level of quality while at the same time pursuing the objectives the Research Centre had set for itself in the above-men-tioned areas. While it is still in its beginnings, our initiative in the field of climate protec-tion and sustainability is manifested particularly in the most sustainable management of resources and travel we can achieve.
We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, ivwKöln [the Institute of Insurance Studies Cologne] and the employees of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
Today, IT infrastructure represents the central nervous system of every company. Many of the activities of our daily lives are handled via the Internet. There is a lack of an adequately sustainable awareness of the cyber risks to which companies are exposed due to advanced digital networking. This is partly due to the fact that the danger of so-called ‘cyber attacks’ is only partially palpable to many, with attacks going unnoticed in some cases. As a result of major incidents, such as WannaCry and Petya in 2017, or Emotet in 2019, awareness of these risks should be keen, and yet vulnerability remains high due to the often insufficient protections against cyber crime.
In recent years, three sovereign catastrophe risk pools have developed worldwide, offering climate insurance against natural disasters in emerging and developing economies:
• Caribbean Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF) in the Caribbean
• African Risk Capacity (ARC) in Africa
• Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance Company (PCRIC) in the Pacific region
These pools have emerged against the backdrop of limited fiscal room for manoeuvre in emerging and developing economies. Increases in tax revenues or capital allocations are scarcely possible in these economies. Moreover, debt on the capital market often ends in debt relief, and this can jeopardise refinancing. Ultimately, the only measure remaining is to provide donations and aid that can be made available by the G7 countries, the World Bank or the World Health Organization, among others.
Lihong Wang reported on the rapid expansion of Chinese Online Insurance. With the ongoing lifestyle and demographic changes, online insurance is becoming one of China's key distributional and operational business models. More than 140 Chinese insurance companies had launched an online business by 2021, with a total premium of 298 billion Yuan (US$45 billion) or 6% of the industry total. Over 7741 enterprises are registered and involved in online insurance. Despite ongoing pandemic issues and lockdowns, online insurance became the accelerators for premium growth in China, especially in the life and health insurance sectors. While the opportunities are enormous, online insurers are facing a number of challenges, such as tightening regulations, a shortage of competent advisors, rising fraud and global recessions. With over 900 million mobile users in China and a population that is ageing and witnessing a reduction in fertility, online insurance will keep growing.
Am Beispiel von Naturkatastrophen (NatKat) Rückversicherung lässt sich erkennen, dass wesentliche Elemente klassischer Rückversiche¬rungs-transaktionen darauf abzielen, Informationsprobleme zwischen Erst- und Rückversicherer zu reduzieren. Aktuell gibt es in der Rückversicherungs¬literatur keinerlei Hinweise auf ein Verständnis darüber, wie sich der klassische Transaktionsprozess auf Ergebnisse auswirkt, noch darauf wie sich Auktionen in ihrer Wirkung unterscheiden / wie sich diese auf Ergebnisse auswirken. Ein wichtiges Ziel ist somit die Grundlagenschaffung für die zukünftige Entwicklung einer Marktdesign Diskussion im Rückversicherungskontext.
Anhand bestehender Erkenntnisse in der Auktionstheorie ist nicht eindeutig, ob und in welchen Fällen Einheitspreise oder individuelle Preise zu besseren Ergebnissen für die Verkäufer (Versicherer) führen würden. Weiterhin ist nicht klar, ob öffentliche Auktionen oder verdeckte Auktionen bessere Ergebnisse liefern würden.
Ein Auktionsdesign, das der klassischen Brokerplatzierung nahekommt, ist die Ausubel Auktion (Ausubel, 2004). Dennoch lassen sich keine generellen Aussagen darüber treffen, ob die klassische Platzierung oder Auktionen bessere Allokations¬mechanismen darstellen (vgl. Bulow and Klemperer 1996).
Unter Berücksichtigung von klimatischen und sozioökonomischen Trends ist ein besseres Verständnis der beschriebenen Zusammenhänge für die Stärkung des Rückversicherungsmarktes zunehmend dringend.
Folgende Aspekte lassen sich im Rahmen dieser Forschung festhalten:
• Im ORSA Bericht 2022 dient eine Anlehnung an die Klimawandelszenarien des „Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)“ (ein Zusammenschluss der Aufsichtsbehörden und Zentralbanken) als erste Orientierung.
• In Anlehnung an das NGFS sind zwei langfristige (mind. 30 Jahre) Temperaturanstiegsszenarien (< 2°C und ≥ 2°C) zur weiteren Analyse auszuwählen.
• Hierfür bietet sich ein Szenario mit hohem Transitionsrisiko (z.B. „Delayed Transition“) und ein Szenario mit hohem physischen Risiko (z.B. „Current Policies“) an.
• Im ORSA 2022 dienen einfach gehaltene, quantitative Analysen als Basis, um daraus qualitative Aussagen abzuleiten, z.B.:
o Neubewertung per heute (Sensitivitätsanalyse)
o Stresstest mit instantanen Schocks („Zeitreise“)
o Projektion (statisch oder mit Managementregeln)
• Schließlich sind bei der Ableitung von Ergebnissen die Besonderheiten der verschiedenen Bereiche/Sparten zu berücksichtigen:
o die Kapitalanlagen könnten beispielsweise langfristig durch Transitionsrisiken geprägt sein (z.B. steigende Energiepreise)
o die Schaden/Unfallversicherung ist geprägt durch das reformierte Baurecht (klimabewusstes Bauen)
o die Personenversicherung ist geprägt durch lange Vertragslaufzeiten.
Das Thema Environmental Social Governance (ESG) gewinnt auch im Rückversicherungssektor aufgrund gestiegener aufsichtsrechtlicher Anforderungen an Relevanz. Dabei wurde in der Vergangenheit der Schwerpunkt auf Investments gelegt. Nun existieren immer mehr ESG-Kriterien, die das Underwriting betreffen. Welche Effekte dies auf die Branche hat, lässt sich heute noch nicht abschätzen. Klar ist, dass wir uns am Anfang einer langen Transformation befinden. ESG-Kriterien werden zukünftig vermutlich als ein weiterer Aspekt neben der versicherungstechnischen Risikobewertung berücksichtigt