Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Report (53) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (53)
Keywords
- Kölner Forschungsstelle Rückversicherung (17)
- Reinsurance (17)
- Forschungsbericht (15)
- Rückversicherung (13)
- Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 (4)
- Versicherung (4)
- Information Retrieval (3)
- Informationsverhalten (3)
- Smart Energy (3)
- Diabetes Typ 1 (2)
Faculty
- Fakultät 03 / Institut für Informationswissenschaft (17)
- Fakultät 04 / Institut für Versicherungswesen (17)
- Fakultät 04 / Schmalenbach Institut für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (6)
- Fakultät 01 / Institut für Geschlechterstudien (4)
- Fakultät 09 / Cologne Institute for Renewable Energy (3)
- Fakultät 01 / Institut für Medienforschung und Medienpädagogik (2)
- Fakultät 03 / Institut für Translation und Mehrsprachige Kommunikation (2)
- Fakultät 01 / Institut für Soziales Recht (1)
- Fakultät 01 / Institut für Sozialpolitik und Sozialmanagement (1)
- Fakultät 05 / Institut für Energieeffiziente Architektur (1)
The reinsurance market is currently faced with great challenges and profound changes. Even after the large NatCat claims in Q3-2017, the substantial hardening of the reinsurance market for which reinsurers had hoped failed to materialise in the year-end renewal. Interest is now focussed on the renewal of retrocession agreements as at 1st April 2018. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects.
In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through organisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance. Currently, there are seven researchers and two coordinating employees on the staff of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, and the employees of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
The reinsurance market continues to face major challenges – at this point we would like to outline just two of these. While renewal of the reinsurance contracts as at 1st January 2019 was largely ‘riskadjusted flat’, renewal of the retrocession contracts was decidedly late. As at the date when this Annual Report 2018 went to press (2nd January 2019), the final trend is still not yet discernible. However, there are signs of a substantial hardening in prices and conditions in the retrocession area. Reinsurers, which are depend on the resource of retrocession capacity, would then be placed in an even more difficult position of increasing the price of retrocession, yet these additional costs cannot be passed on to the assignors under their active reinsurance contracts. Not least the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority [BaFin] is also certain to set its sights on this aspect in its analysis of the prevailing reinsurance price level, which has been announced for 2019. Of particular interest with regard to a potential determination of insufficient market conditions would also be the resulting reaction by BaFin (and the basis on which this would occur). A decisive factor for a possible strengthening of the retrocession market would be a changed attitude on the part of alternative capital, which in recent years already provided 50-70% of the retrocession capacity – and rising – via ILS funds and other mechanisms. Unlike traditional reinsurers, ‘innocent investors’ such as pension funds were increasingly nervous as a result of the high number of claims again in 2018 – particularly the California wildfires in Q4 2018 – as well as the drop in the fund share price of numerous ILS funds prior to the renewal at 1st January 2019.
A further substantial burden on the business climate lies in the utter ambiguity with regard to the modalities of Brexit on 29th March 2019. A no-deal Brexit would seem to be a real – and perhaps even a probable – alternative. This would create a large vacuum
in legal certainty by eliminating many EU-UK contracts and agreements. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects. In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through organisation
of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung], a bi-directional
transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance.
- 5 -
Currently, there are nine researchers and two employees responsible for science management on the staff of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all
material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance.
We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, ivwKöln [the Institute of Insurance Cologne] and the employees of the
Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
The reinsurance market continues to face major challenges – at this point we would like to outline just one of these, by way of example. The renewal of reinsurance contracts effective 1st January 2020 seems to present an-other disappointment for the reinsurance sector. This development is surprising for a substantial hardening of prices and conditions, not only in the retrocession area but also in the primary (corporate) insurance market. As a rule, a price increase in the retrocession sector is initially followed by a price rise in the reinsurance industry, which then ultimately also occurs in the primary (corporate) insurance market. Yet the trend we are currently witnessing seems to have skipped over the reinsurers. This confronts the reinsurance market with the question of whether – and, if so, when – the price adjustments will also take effect in the case of reinsurance contracts. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research pro-jects. In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through or-ganisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung], a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance. There are seven researchers, two employees responsible for research management and one administrative employee currently on the staff of the Cologne Research Cen-tre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. Within the scope of its social and environmental responsibility, this year the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance dealt with the topics of climate protection, sustaina-bility and equality. Because these topics are at once global, national and individual missions, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance developed ideas and took measures to actively practice climate protection, sustainability and equality. In this ef-fort, great importance was attached to maintaining the level of quality while at the same time pursuing the objectives the Research Centre had set for itself in the above-men-tioned areas. While it is still in its beginnings, our initiative in the field of climate protec-tion and sustainability is manifested particularly in the most sustainable management of resources and travel we can achieve.
We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, ivwKöln [the Institute of Insurance Studies Cologne] and the employees of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
The reinsurance market continues to face major challenges – at this point we would like to outline just one of these, by way of example. The renewal of reinsurance contracts effective 1st January 2020 seems to present an-other disappointment for the reinsurance sector. This development is surprising for a substantial hardening of prices and conditions, not only in the retrocession area but also in the primary (corporate) insurance market. As a rule, a price increase in the retrocession sector is initially followed by a price rise in the reinsurance industry, which then ultimately also occurs in the primary (corporate) insurance market. Yet the trend we are currently witnessing seems to have skipped over the reinsurers. This confronts the reinsurance market with the question of whether – and, if so, when – the price adjustments will also take effect in the case of reinsurance contracts. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research pro-jects. In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through or-ganisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung], a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance. There are seven researchers, two employees responsible for research management and one administrative employee currently on the staff of the Cologne Research Cen-tre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. Within the scope of its social and environmental responsibility, this year the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance dealt with the topics of climate protection, sustaina-bility and equality. Because these topics are at once global, national and individual missions, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance developed ideas and took measures to actively practice climate protection, sustainability and equality. In this ef-fort, great importance was attached to maintaining the level of quality while at the same time pursuing the objectives the Research Centre had set for itself in the above-men-tioned areas. While it is still in its beginnings, our initiative in the field of climate protec-tion and sustainability is manifested particularly in the most sustainable management of resources and travel we can achieve.
We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, ivwKöln [the Institute of Insurance Studies Cologne] and the employees of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects. In the process, the Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. The year 2020 was dominated by the global COVID-19 pandemic. There were numerous substantial challenges that arose not just in general but also for the (re-)insurance industry in particular. Naturally, interaction and practical, bidirectional knowledge transfer at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance was also hard-hit by the many event cancellations and their makeshift relocation to online formats. We particularly regretted the cancellation of the 17th Cologne Reinsurance Symposium. The 13th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance was quite a success in the chosen online format – but of course we would like to return to the traditional event format at Clostermannshof as soon as possible. A complete success, on the other hand, with 178 participants, was the webinar series hosted by the Research Centre for Reinsurance on the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) initiative on risk mitigation techniques that could alter the effects of reinsurance under Solvency II.
There are twelve people currently employed at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. All of the personnel, material and travel costs for the Research Centre for Reinsurance are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. The special circumstances were scarcely an impediment to the research, communication and cooperation among the employees of the Research Centre for Reinsurance. As most employees do not live and work in Cologne, anyway, working from home and online had been the rule for them even before the coronavirus crisis hit. The transition to a setting working from home was (nearly) a smooth one for the other employees as well. As every year, we would like to express our appreciation to the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, and the Institute of Insurance Studies for their support of our research work.
The challenges facing the reinsurance industry remain considerable. For the reinsurance sector, 2021 was marked by claims for natural disasters (Hurricane Ida, flooding in Europe, etc.) and the coronavirus pandemic.
The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects. In the process, the Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through organisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung], a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued.
The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance.
There are ten researchers and four professors currently on the staff of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. This funding helped facilitate the doctorate of Mr Frank Cremer, among other things.
At the 14th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance held in 2021, a decision was taken to provide financial support to the non-profit organisation ‘Hilfe für Guinea e.V.’ The donation will benefit the La Lumière Scolaire project. This project finances the construction and operation of schools for the children of disabled and homeless people in Guinea.
The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance is accredited as an official research focus of the Cologne University of Applied Sciences.
The challenges facing the reinsurance industry remain considerable. For the reinsurance sector, 2022 was marked not only by the ongoing coronavirus pandemic and claims due to natural disasters but also by the war in Ukraine, the energy crisis and inflation.
The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects. In the process, the Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through organisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung], a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. Unfortunately the Cologne Reinsurance Symposium for 2022 had to be cancelled due to COVID-19.
The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance.
There are eight researchers and four professors currently on the staff of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. This funding helped facilitate the doctorate of Mr Frank Cremer, among other things.
At the 14th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance held in 2021, the decision was taken to continue to provide financial support to the non-profit organisation ‘Hilfe für Guinea e.V.’ Through its annual donation to this project, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance fulfils the criterion of ‘social commitment’ required of an official research focus. The donation will benefit the La Lumière Scolaire project. This project finances the construction and operation of schools for the children of disabled and homeless people in Guinea.
The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance is accredited as an official research focus of the Cologne University of Applied Sciences.
Im Rahmen von MILOS II wurde das erste MILOS-Projekt zur automatischen Indexierung von Titeldaten um eine semantische Komponente erweitert, indem Thesaurusrelationen der Schlagwortnormdatei eingebunden wurden. Der abschließend zur Evaluierung des Projekts durchgeführte Retrievaltest und seine Ergebnisse stehen im Mittelpunkt dieses Texts. Zusätzlich wird ein Überblick über bereits durchgeführte Retrievaltests (vorwiegend des anglo-amerikanischen Raums) gegeben und es wird erläutert, welche grundlegenden Fragestellungen bei der praktischen Durchführung eines Retrievaltests zu beachten sind.
Zielsetzung der Studie war die Erhebung der Betroffenheit von Pflegeverantwortung des wissenschaftlichen Personals, die Bewältigungsformen und die beruflichen und gesundheitlichen Konsequenzen am Beispiel der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. Im Mixed-Methods-Forschungsdesign wurden qualitative Interviews mit zentralen Akteuren der Universität (N=16) mit einer quantitativen Online-Erhebung am wissenschaftlichen Personal (N=967) kombiniert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass 16% des wissenschaftlichen Personals zum Befragungszeitpunkt von Pflegeverantwortung betroffen waren, teilweise mit erheblichen gesundheitlichen Konsequenzen sowie einem insgesamt sehr hohem Mental Load. Rund die Hälfte der Wissenschaftler*innen antizipiert eine Pflegeverantwortung sicher oder wahrscheinlich für die nächsten Jahre. Die qualitativen Interviewergebnisse zeigen eine gestiegene Wahrnehmung der Relevanz von Pflege-/Sorgeverantwortung an der Universität. Gleichzeitig wurde deutlich, dass Pflegeverantwortung deutlich weniger sichtbar ist als die Sorge um Kinder und auch kaum durch konkrete Maßnahmen adressiert wird. Die Ergebnisse münden in Handlungsempfehlungen zur Verbesserung der Vereinbarkeit von wissenschaftlicher Laufbahn und der Sorge-/Pflegeverantwortung für Angehörige.
Die Fachhochschule Köln führte mit Unterstützung des Instituts für e-Management e.V. eine Studie zu Wissensmanagement vom März 2004 bis Januar 2005 durch. An der Befragung nahmen 89 Personen aus den Branchen Industrie, Handel und Dienstleistung teil. Um herauszufinden, was ein erfolgreiches von einem weniger erfolgreichen Wissensmanagement unterscheidet, lag der Fokus der Studie auf den dafür verantwortlichen Faktoren. Dabei wurden durch systematische Fragen die Dimensionen Mensch, Organisation und Technik unterschieden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen klar auf, dass die Barrieren im organisatorischen Bereich zu suchen sind. Fehlende Zeit wird hier als sehr relevant angesehen. Die Ergebnisse der Studie zeigen u. a. wichtige Ziele, Barrieren und Erfolgsfaktoren im Umgang mit Wissensmanagement. Im Zusammenhang mit den Zielen, die für ein Wissensmanagementsystem gesetzt werden, erachten die Befragten die Verbesserung von Prozessabläufen und Kommunikationsflüssen als besonders wichtig. Nach Ansicht der Befragten ist der Erfolg von Wissensmanagement hauptsächlich von der Einstellung der User abhängig. So rangieren Unterstützung des Wissensmanagements durch das Top-Management, ein hoher Stellenwert von Wissen im Unternehmen und die Akzeptanz des Wissensmanagement durch die Mitarbeiter ganz oben bei den Angaben für Erfolgsfaktoren.
Folgende Aspekte lassen sich im Rahmen dieser Forschung festhalten:
• Im ORSA Bericht 2022 dient eine Anlehnung an die Klimawandelszenarien des „Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)“ (ein Zusammenschluss der Aufsichtsbehörden und Zentralbanken) als erste Orientierung.
• In Anlehnung an das NGFS sind zwei langfristige (mind. 30 Jahre) Temperaturanstiegsszenarien (< 2°C und ≥ 2°C) zur weiteren Analyse auszuwählen.
• Hierfür bietet sich ein Szenario mit hohem Transitionsrisiko (z.B. „Delayed Transition“) und ein Szenario mit hohem physischen Risiko (z.B. „Current Policies“) an.
• Im ORSA 2022 dienen einfach gehaltene, quantitative Analysen als Basis, um daraus qualitative Aussagen abzuleiten, z.B.:
o Neubewertung per heute (Sensitivitätsanalyse)
o Stresstest mit instantanen Schocks („Zeitreise“)
o Projektion (statisch oder mit Managementregeln)
• Schließlich sind bei der Ableitung von Ergebnissen die Besonderheiten der verschiedenen Bereiche/Sparten zu berücksichtigen:
o die Kapitalanlagen könnten beispielsweise langfristig durch Transitionsrisiken geprägt sein (z.B. steigende Energiepreise)
o die Schaden/Unfallversicherung ist geprägt durch das reformierte Baurecht (klimabewusstes Bauen)
o die Personenversicherung ist geprägt durch lange Vertragslaufzeiten.
Die Nutzung von Online-Videos nimmt immer weiter zu und eröffnet neuen Akteuren den Eintritt in diesen, sich entwickelnden Markt. Mediencluster können diesen Trend nutzen, indem sie versuchen, einige dieser neuen Akteure anzuziehen. Gleichwohl ist die Standortentscheidung von Online-Video-Produzenten bisher kaum untersucht. Um mögliche Webvideo-Cluster zu identifizieren, die Struktur der Branche zu untersuchen und Faktoren für die Standortentscheidung aufzudecken, wurden 2.130 Webvideo-Unternehmen, die deutsch- oder englischsprachige Videos auf YouTube, Facebook, Instagram oder Twitch in Deutschland distribuieren, erfasst und befragt. Die meisten Webvideo-Unternehmen haben ihren Sitz in Berlin, Köln, Hamburg oder München. 60 Prozent der Unternehmen agieren als Einzelunternehmer/in (bzw. als Privatperson) und ein Großteil arbeitet kostendeckend bzw. mit einem Gewinnüberschuss. Die räumliche Nähe zur Kreativ- und Medienwirtschaft und die Verfügbarkeit medientechnischer Mitarbeiter am Standort sowie ein urbanes Umfeld und eine gute Infrastruktur sind die wichtigsten Standortfaktoren für die Webvideo-Unternehmen.
El proyecto diccionario español-alemán de locuciones del español de España de Colonia/Hamburgo
(2009)
Ya han pasado varios años desde que la revista Estudis Romànics tuvo la amabilidad de publicarnos una primera presentación de nuestro proyecto (cf. Torrent-Lenzen 2007), hoy todavía en curso, que consiste en la elaboración de un Diccionario español-alemán de locuciones del español de España. Entre tanto, hemos avanzado considerablemente en nuestro trabajo fraseográfico y también hemos ido modificando nuestros objetivos, con lo cual dicho artículo ha perdido actualidad. Es por esta razón que, estando más o menos “a mitad de camino”, queremos exponer de nuevo, en las páginas que siguen, los rasgos principales de nuestra obra, tal como la concebimos ahora después de que hayan madurado muchas ideas.
Evit@ stellt ein Bewertungsinstrument bereit, mit dessen Hilfe qualitative Aussagen über elektronische Informationsmittel möglich werden. Für die erste Phase des Projektes standen offline (insbesondere CD-ROM-) Produkte wegen ihres besonderen Marktanteiles im Vordergrund. Eine Stärke des Verfahrens liegt dabei auf der vergleichenden Produktanalyse und auf einem weitgehend entindividualisierten Ansatz. Entwickelt wurde das Verfahren auf der Basis einer umfangreichen Analyse der überwiegend in der angloamerikanischen Fachliteratur publizierten Kriterien zur Analyse und Bewertung von Informationsmitteln. Das entwickelte Kriteriensystem geht in seiner Differenziertheit über alle bisherigen Ansätze hinaus. Insbesondere eignet sich das Verfahren zur produkttypenbezogenen Gewichtung bei der quantifizierenden Beschreibung aller wesentlichen Eigenschaften und Leistungsmerkmale elektronischer Informationsmittel (z.B. bei Handhabung, Suche und Navigation). Ausgeklammert bleiben dabei bislang die rein inhaltsbezogenen Aspekte. Über eine eigens entwickelte Softwarekomponente kann das Bewertungsergebnis sowohl auf jede einzelne Kategorie bezogen als auch in Form eines kondensierten Endergebnisses dargestellt werden. Diese Ergebnisse können im Sinne eines Qualitätsurteils Hilfestellung für Auswahl und Kaufentscheidungen bieten. Für Produzenten elektronischer Informationsmittel kann das Kriteriensystem darüber hinaus als Checkliste zur Qualitätssicherung eingesetzt werden. Dieser Projektbericht beschreibt den Projektverlauf, die Projektergebnisse und die möglichen Projektfortsetzungen.
This is the fifth time that TH Köln has conducted this study to examine the local XR industry´on behalf of Mediencluster NRW GmbH, a subsidiary of Film- und Medienstiftung NRW. Aside from the two surveys on the North Rhine-Westphalian sector, there have now been three studies on the nationwide XR (extended or cross reality) sector in Germany. By this we mean all companies that create products and services in the field of virtual, mixed or augmented reality (but not firms that employ XR as users).
In recent years there have been numerous technical innovations such as CGM systems or insulin pumps that have made life easier for people with type 1 diabetes. However, this also means that more and more information is available. The aim of the present study is to find out more about the daily handling of information. The following research question was asked: What information do people with type 1 diabetes use? To answer this research question, a quantitative online survey of people with type 1 diabetes was conducted by Prof. Dr. Matthias Fank at the Technical University of Cologne. The online survey mainly consisted of 25 closed questions, which were asked on a scale from 0 to 10. The responses of 1,025 people who are at least 18 years old were included in the evaluation. The most important information for type 1 diabetics is the "current value". 67.5% have this on Place 1 placed. Current glucose levels are provided by CGM systems used by 94.2% of people with type 1 diabetes. Quarterly visits to the diabetologist are important and provide important information. 30.8% “completely” agree with this statement on a scale from 0 to 10. Only 2.2% of people with type 1 diabetes are satisfied with their current diabetes management apps. There is a desire for a manufacturer-independent app. The strongest agreement with a value of 10 was chosen by almost a quarter (24.6%) of the people with type 1 diabetes. The study provides an insight into diabetes therapy and shows the need for action.
In den letzten Jahren gab es zahlreiche technische Innovationen wie CGM Systeme oder Insulin- pumpen, die das Leben von Menschen mit Typ-1-Diabetes erleichtert haben. Dies führt aber auch dazu, dass immer mehr Informationen zur Verfügung stehen. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es, mehr über den täglichen Umgang mit Informationen zu erfahren. Dazu wurde die folgende Forschungsfrage gestellt: Welche Informationen nutzen Menschen mit Typ-1-Diabetes?
Um diese Forschungsfrage zu beantworten, wurde eine quantitative Online-Befragung von Men- schen mit Typ-1-Diabetes von Prof. Dr. Matthias Fank an der Technischen Hochschule Köln durch- geführt. Die Online-Befragung bestand überwiegend aus 25 geschlossenen Fragen, die auf einer Skala von 0 bis 10 gestellt wurden. In die Auswertung gingen die Antworten von 1.025 Personen, die mindestens 18 Jahre alt sind, ein.
Die wichtigste Information für Typ-1-Diabetiker ist der “aktuelle Wert“. Diesen haben 67,5% auf
Platz 1 gesetzt. Der aktuelle Glukosewert wird durch CGM-Systeme bereitgestellt, die von 94,2% der Menschen mit Typ-1-Diabetes genutzt werden. Quartalsbesuche beim Diabetologen sind wichtig und liefern wichtige Informationen. Dieser Aussage stimmen 30,8% auf einer Skala von 0 bis 10 „voll und ganz“ zu.
Nur 2,2% der Menschen mit Typ-1-Diabetes sind mit ihren derzeitigen Apps für die Diabetestherapie zufrieden. Der Wunsch nach einer herstellerunabhängigen App ist vorhanden. Die stärkste Zustim- mung mit einem Wert von 10 haben fast ein Viertel (24,6%) der Menschen mit Typ-1-Diabetes ge- wählt. Die Studie gibt einen Einblick in die Diabetestherapie und zeigt Handlungsbedarf auf.