Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (34) (remove)
Language
- English (34) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (34)
Keywords
- Rückversicherung (26)
- Versicherung (25)
- Reinsurance (22)
- Versicherungswirtschaft (21)
- Kölner Forschungsstelle Rückversicherung (15)
- Browser (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Authentication (1)
- Authentifikation (1)
- Automation (1)
The 11th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance (Förderkreis
Rückversicherung) on the topic of reinsurance was held 13 July 2018, in
Niederkassel near Cologne. Some 85 invited representatives of the (re)insurance
companies supporting the Sponsoring Group took part in the meeting, together with
guests. Offered for the fourth time as part of the Annual Meeting, the Researchers’
Corner gave eight members of academic staff at the Cologne Research Centre for
Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver a presentation on their respective individual
research projects.
Professor Materne also conducted interviews with Dr. Falk Niehörster (Climate Risk
Innovations) and Dr. Magnus Kobel (YAS.life). Dr. Niehörster reported on his
research and consulting activities in regard to maritime climate change and Dr. Kobel
on the business model of his InsurTec, YAS.life, and his general experience in the
establishment and development of start-ups.
In three sessions – each with 2-3 parallel lectures with posters – the most important
results of the scientific studies by the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance were
presented and discussed. The heterogeneity of the topics presented by academic
staff reflects the dovetailing of research theory with practice.
The 16th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung] was held 16 June 2023 in Niederkassel, near Cologne. Some 90 representatives of the (re)insurance companies involved in the Sponsoring Group
took part in the meeting, along with guests. Offered for the ninth time as part of the Annual Meeting, the Researchers’ Corner gave the six academic researchers at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver a presentation on the research project in which each is involved in 2023. Over the course of three sessions, the most important results of the scientific studies by the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance were presented and discussed.
The heterogeneity of the topics presented reflects the dovetailing of Cologne Research Centre with reinsurance practice.
The 14th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance was held 25 June 2021. Due to COVID-19, the event was held in an online format again this year. Some 80 representatives of the (re)insurance companies involved in the Sponsoring Group
took part in the meeting, along with guests. Offered for the seventh time as part of the Annual Meeting, the Researchers’ Corner gave the seven academic researchers at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver a
presentation on the research project in which each is involved in 2021. Over the course of three sessions, the most important results of the scientific studies by the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance were presented and discussed.
The heterogeneity of the topics presented reflects the dovetailing of Cologne Research Centre with reinsurance practice.
The 13th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance was held 26 June 2020. Due to COVID-19, the event was held online this year. Some 80 representatives of the (re)insurance companies involved in the Sponsoring Group took part in the meeting, along with guests. Offered for the sixth time as part of the Annual Meeting, the Researchers’ Corner gave the seven academic researchers at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver a presentation on the research project each in which each is involved in 2020.
In three sessions – each featuring 2-3 parallel lectures with posters – the most important results of the scientific studies by the Cologne Research Centre for
Reinsurance were presented and discussed. The heterogeneity of the topics
presented by academic staff reflects the dovetailing of Cologne Research Centre with reinsurance practice.
Session 1
a) Manuel Dietmann (M.Sc.): Preventive recovery planning for insurance companies
b) Robert Joniec (M.Sc., FCII, cand. PhD): Capital is fungible, the market is
growing more efficient – But how valid are research results?
c) Jörg Dirks (M.Sc., FCII): Cyber risks in reinsurance – Insurable on a parametric basis through AI?
Session 2
a) Wolfgang Koch (M.Sc., FCII): Trend in sovereign cat pools in emerging and developing economies
b) Fabian Lassen (M.Sc., FCII): Environmental social governance – A look at reinsurers
Session 3
a) Fabian Pütz (M.Sc., PhD): Reinsurance aspects of product recalls in the automobile sector
b) Lihong Wang (M.Sc., FCII): China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) – Its impact
on the global (re)insurance industry
Poster session
a) Fabian Lassen (M.Sc., FCII): Private-public partnership – The solution for the insurability of pandemics?
b) Christian Serries (B.Sc.): Silent Cyber as a challenge for the (re-)
insurance industry
c) Frank Cremer (B.Sc. / FCII): Digital ecosystems – Relevance for reinsurance?
d) Harald Kurtze (B.Sc.): Sharing economy – Impacts for reinsurance?
With the publication series, ‘Proceedings of the Researchers’ Corner’, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance meets the desire for publication of the research results of our scholars together with the accompanying posters and discussions. The titles are reproduced in keeping with the above agenda of the Researchers’ Corner
for the 13th Annual Meeting of the Förderkreis Rückversicherung [Sponsoring Group Reinsurance].
The 12th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance [Förderkreis Rückversicherung] was held 5th July 2019 in Niederkassel, near Cologne. Some 80
representatives of the (re)insurance companies involved in the Sponsoring Group took part in the meeting, along with guests. Offered for the fifth time as part of the
Annual Meeting, the Researchers’ Corner gave eight members of academic staff at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver a presentation on their respective current research projects. In three sessions – each featuring 2-3 parallel lectures with posters – the most important results of the scientific studies by the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance were presented and discussed. The heterogeneity of the topics presented by academic staff reflects the dovetailing of Cologne Research Centre with reinsurance practice.
Session 1
a) Manuel Dietmann (M.Sc.): The increasing importance of the riskmanagement function in insurance companies
b) Robert Joniec (M.Sc., FCII, cand. PhD): How is the reinsurance cycle doing?
c) Wolfgang Koch (M.Sc., FCII): Information asymmetries between reinsurance brokers and assignors
Session 2
a) Jörg Dirks (M.Sc., FCII): Unmanned aircraft – Evolution of the market for aviation (re-)insurance
b) Fabian Lassen (M.Sc., FCII): Reducing volatility through use of an insurance swap
c) Fabian Pütz (M.Sc., cand. PhD): Transferring cat risks from emerging markets from a macroeconomic perspective Session 3
a) Kai-Olaf Knocks (M.A., FCII): The ILS market in 2019 – discouragement or wait-and-see?
b) Lihong Wang (M.Sc., FCII, cand. PhD): China InsurTech development
With the publication series, ‘Proceedings of the Researchers’ Corner’, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance meets the desire for publication of the research results of our scholars together with the accompanying posters and discussions. The titles are reproduced in keeping with the above agenda of the Researchers’ Corner for the 12th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. As part of the event, Prof. Materne also conducted an interview with Mr Ingo Wichelhaus (Senior Director, Mount Street) on the topic of risk management and portfolio management. Particular attention was devoted to the broad spectrum of risk for financing in the shipping sector.
The 10th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance was held 7 July 2017, in Niederkassel
near Köln. Some 80 representatives of the (re)insurance companies involved in the Sponsoring Group took part in the meeting, together with invited guests. Offered for the third time as part of the Annual Meeting, the Researchers’ Corner gave nine members of academic staff at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver short presentations on their individual research projects. Professor Materne also conducted interviews with Messrs Lorenz Kielwein and
Frank Baumann. Kielwein reported on the application of mathematical systems theory to processes in change management, and Baumann on his 30 years of experience at Gothaer. During each of three sessions, three short lectures with posters were held in parallel and discussed afterwards. The heterogeneity of the topics presented by the staff members reflects the dovetailing
of research theory with practice.
In the sessions, the following speakers presented in German and English:
Round 1
a) Fabian Pütz (M.Sc.)
Alternative Capital and Basic Risk in the Standard Formula (Non-Life) of Solvency II
b) Manuel Dietmann (M.Sc.)
SFCR: Findings for Initial Publication
c) Jan Böggemann (B.Sc.)
Optimising the Purchase of Optional Reinsurance by an Industrial Insurer
Round 2
a) Robert Joniec (M.Sc.)
Actuarial swap
b) Lucas Kaiser (M.Sc.)
The Impact of Different Determinants on the Rating of Reinsurance Companies
c) Lihong Wang (M.Sc., FCII)
Chinese Automobile Vehicle Recall Insurance
Round 3
a) Sebastian Hoos (M.Sc., FCII)
Critical Analysis of the Practical Application of the Definition of an Event
b) Fabian Lassen (B.A.)
Employees in the Reinsurance Industry: Germany and the USA.
c) Kai-Olaf Knocks (M.A., FCII)
[Autonomous Driving: Evolution or Revolution?
The presentations also featured the work of another member of our staff who unfortunately, for
logistical reasons, was able to present his research project in poster form but was not able to deliver
a brief lecture.
Poster
d) Wolfgang Koch (B.A.)
Public-Private Partnership in Emerging and Developing Countries.
We would like to thank the funding bodies who make this event possible to begin with and provide our scholars an opportunity to conduct their research.
Die Bedeutung von Cyber-Versicherungen als Instrument zur finanziellen Absicherung, um die zunehmenden Unternehmensverluste durch Cyber-Risiken abzumildern, nimmt zu. Es mangelt jedoch an standardisierten Wordings und gegenseitigem Verständnis bei Cyberversicherungs-Policen. Mit weniger als einem Drittel der 2017 in den USA ausgezahlten Cyberversicherungsansprüche besteht eine erhebliche Lücke zwischen den Cyber-Risiken, die Unternehmen abdecken müssen, und denen, die tatsächlich durch ihre Cyberversicherungspolicen abgedeckt sind. Im Jahre 2018 wurde von Lloyds of London eine Schätzung mithilfe von Szenario-basierten Modellen durchgeführt, um zu ermitteln, wie groß die Versicherungsschutzlücke im Hinblick auf Cyber-Risiken ist. Man ist dabei zu dem Ergebnis gekommen, dass die Versicherungsschutzlücke ungefähr 90 % beträgt. Der Begriff bezeichnet die Differenz zwischen dem Versicherungsschutz, welcher ökonomisch benötigt wird und dem tatsächlich gekauften.
Diese Forschung befasste sich mit den deutschen Cyber-Versicherern, welche Cyber-Schutz für kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen (KMU) anbieten. Im Rahmen dieser Forschung wurden nur die Ausschlüsse von Cyber-Versicherungen betrachtet. Zusätzliche erweiterbare oder kostenpflichtige Einschlüsse wurden nicht berücksichtigt. Als Grundlage für die Forschung wurde ein Datensatz erstellt, welcher auf Informationen der BaFin basiert. Durch mehrere Segmentierungsstufen wurden 50 Cyber-Versicherer ermittelt, welche Cyber-Schutz für KMUs angeboten haben. Von diesen 50 Cyber-Versicherern konnten 41 Cyber-Bedingungswerke für das Forschungsprojekt herangezogen werden. Im Rahmen der Forschung wurden nun die Bedingungswerke mittels einer induktiven qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse auf die bestehenden Ausschlüsse analysiert. Die Ergebnisse wurden kategorisiert und beschrieben. Innerhalb der Analyse konnten 15 Ausschlusskategorien sowie deren Häufigkeiten in den Cyber-Bedingungen ermittelt werden. Diese Ergebnisse können dazu beitragen, dass Unternehmen eine Vorstellung davon erhalten, was nicht in den Cyber-Versicherungen enthalten sein könnte. Zudem liefern die Beschreibungen eine Informationsgrundlage und tragen so dazu bei, dass der Versicherungsschutz bzw. die Ausschlüsse besser verstanden werden.
Risk-based authentication (RBA) is an adaptive security measure to strengthen password-based authentication. RBA monitors additional implicit features during password entry such as device or geolocation information, and requests additional authentication factors if a certain risk level is detected. RBA is recommended by the NIST digital identity guidelines, is used by several large online services, and offers protection against security risks such as password database leaks, credential stuffing, insecure passwords and large-scale guessing attacks. Despite its relevance, the procedures used by RBA-instrumented online services are currently not disclosed. Consequently, there is little scientific research about RBA, slowing down progress and deeper understanding, making it harder for end users to understand the security provided by the services they use and trust, and hindering the widespread adoption of RBA.
In this paper, with a series of studies on eight popular online services, we (i) analyze which features and combinations/classifiers are used and are useful in practical instances, (ii) develop a framework and a methodology to measure RBA in the wild, and (iii) survey and discuss the differences in the user interface for RBA. Following this, our work provides a first deeper understanding of practical RBA deployments and helps fostering further research in this direction.
Diskussionen über Gleichwertigkeitsbeschlüsse und bilateral ausgehandelte Abkommen wie z. B. das Covered Agreement zur Regelung des Betriebs von Rückversicherungsgeschäft zwischen der EU und den Vereinigten Staaten könnten für international tätige Versicherungsgruppen zukünftig der Vergangenheit angehören. Als Vereinigung von Versicherungsbehörden aus über 200 Ländern arbeitet die International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) seit 2013 an der Entwicklung eines risikobasierten, global anwendbaren Kapitalstandards (Insurance Capital Standard – ICS). Übergeordnetes Ziel ist die Schaffung eines übergreifenden Regulierungsrahmens für große international tätige Versicherungsgruppen mit Mindeststandards für die Bewertung von Risiken und daraus resultierenden Anforderungen an die Kapitalausstattung.
Es liegt in der Natur der Sache, dass bei der Entwicklung eines globalen Kapitalstandards die Interessen aus vielen verschiedenen Jurisdiktionen mit unterschiedlichen Systemen aufeinandertreffen (insbesondere trifft die verschiedenen Aufsichtsregime aus Europa und den Vereinigten Staaten aufeinander). Das IAIS hat sich zum Ziel gesetzt, die Interessengruppen zusammen zu bringen und ohne die lokalen Aufsichtsregime in den Jurisdiktionen auszuklammern, einen globalen Mindestkapitalstandard für international tätige Versicherungsgruppen zu entwickeln.
Der ICS wird im Rahmen der Konsolidierungsmethode berechnet und weist daher viele Ähnlichkeiten mit Solvency II auf. Der US Alternativansatz wird im Rahmen der Aggregationsmethode berechnet und soll ähnliche Ergebnisse zur Konsolidierungsmethode liefern.
Am Ende stellt sich für die europäischen (Rück-)Versicherungsunternehmen die Frage, ob man akzeptiert, dass US Ansatz äquivalent zum ICS ist, um das Ziel eines globalen Kapitalstandards als Level Playing Field zu etablieren.
Online services such as social networks, online shops, and search engines deliver different content to users depending on their location, browsing history, or client device. Since these services have a major influence on opinion forming, understanding their behavior from a social science perspective is of greatest importance. In addition, technical aspects of services such as security or privacy are becoming more and more relevant for users, providers, and researchers. Due to the lack of essential data sets, automatic black box testing of online services is currently the only way for researchers to investigate these services in a methodical and reproducible manner. However, automatic black box testing of online services is difficult since many of them try to detect and block automated requests to prevent bots from accessing them.
In this paper, we introduce a testing tool that allows researchers to create and automatically run experiments for exploratory studies of online services. The testing tool performs programmed user interactions in such a manner that it can hardly be distinguished from a human user. To evaluate our tool, we conducted - among other things - a large-scale research study on Risk-based Authentication (RBA), which required human-like behavior from the client. We were able to circumvent the bot detection of the investigated online services with the experiments. As this demonstrates the potential of the presented testing tool, it remains to the responsibility of its users to balance the conflicting interests between researchers and service providers as well as to check whether their research programs remain undetected.