Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (16) (remove)
Document Type
- Master's Thesis (11)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Article (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- English (16) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (16)
Keywords
- Reinsurance (3)
- Germany (2)
- Rückversicherung (2)
- Versicherung (2)
- Accesibility (1)
- Arzneimittelresistenz (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Auctions (1)
- Authenticity (1)
- Authentizität (1)
Faculty
- Fakultät 12 / Institut für Technologie und Ressourcenmanagement in den Tropen und Subtropen (8)
- Fakultät 04 / Institut für Versicherungswesen (2)
- Fakultät 10 / Advanced Media Institute (2)
- Angewandte Naturwissenschaften (F11) (1)
- Fakultät 04 / Schmalenbach Institut für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (1)
- Fakultät 05 / Institut für Gestaltung (1)
- Fakultät 10 / Institut für Informatik (1)
Worldwide there is a big need for affordable livingspace. Globalization leads to a connection of development and ideas in the field of building. Open Source communities could improve and accelerate this development. The potential of theses communities lies in the connection of different diciplines. Especially for building projects with a small budget and a willingness to participate in the work process open source do-it-yourself constructions are a great opportunity to help cover the need of affordable work and living space. Renewable materials such as wood offer great potential here. New, standardised technologies make a decentralised production possible.
Food insecurity, poor nutrition and poverty are closely linked and entail adverse consequences for the health and well-being of children and adults. They constitute major constraints to development efforts as they can imply lifelong negative effects on human development with impairments on physical and mental capacities of a population, resulting in an overall lower productivity and economic growth potential.
Urban agriculture has been advocated as a strategy to improve food security. This paper exemplifies an urban gardening project that addresses food security and economic resilience of the Syrian refugees and vulnerable Lebanese host communities executed in the suburbs of Beirut. The hypothesis underpinning this study is that urban agriculture holds the potential to contribute to increased food security and reduced urban poverty, by increasing the availability and accessibility to a variety of fresh foods that are rich in vital nutrients and by functioning as a source of livelihoods and income.
The brutality of the Syrian Civil War, it’s massive damage and destruction of housing and persecutions for ethnic cleansing led more than a quarter of its originally 24 million inhabitants to seek safety in neighboring countries and Europe. The war has severely hampered the stability and development throughout the region as hundreds of thousands of refugees have fled to neighboring countries where they often compete with host communities over housing, labor, water, food and land. In relative numbers the biggest burden fell on the riparian country Lebanon, currently holding the highest ratio of refugees to nationals in the world. The small Arab country has already been suffering from many pre-existing challenges as food insecurity and widespread poverty.
The high dependence on food assistance, limited access to income and uncertainties on the amount of food aid provided in each upcoming year, all contribute to an unstable and low food security status of Syrian refugee households in Lebanon with spill overs to vulnerable host communities. In 2017, 91% of Syrian families residing in Lebanon remained food insecure to some degree and the share of household’s falling into severe food insecurity keeps increasing with every year.
These numbers provide clear evidence that current efforts of providing food assistance are not sufficient to combat the repercussions of the crisis and get the situation under control.
The paper displays the impact of the urban gardening project on the food security and economic resilience of participating household’s, as well as lessons learned on the project design during and after the implementation phase. The sampling frame is comprised of Syrian and Lebanese families participating in the project. Primary data were derived from a survey using a questionnaire with a sample size of 41 households. The findings aim to enable stakeholders to improve the performance of similar projects in the future and support relevant government authorities, international aid institutions, non-profits and the civic society towards creating sustainable long-term solutions to increase the self-reliance of refugees by providing insights of the suitability of UA for multiple objectives and by highlighting potential challenges and risks.
Since the development of eGovernment systems is gaining worldwide momentum, the European Union is constantly increasing its efforts to induce the development of eGovernment systems in its member states. The currently running strategy is the ’eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020’, which understands itself as a catalyst for developments in the member states.
Despite these ongoing efforts by the European Union regarding eGovernment, stud- ies are repeatedly revealing that the quality and acceptance by the citizens of dig- ital public services are varying heavily within the EU. Being based on the same political guidelines provided by the EU, the national strategies implemented the core principles to different degrees. These different implementation rates, analyzed for Germany, the United Kingdom and Estonia, supplement the holistic analysis of the eGovernment policies, applications and usage in each member state. This gets proven by the connection of this indicator with related studies in the field of eGov- ernment applications and usage within the European Union.
The aim of this thesis is, on the one hand, to quantify differences in the implementa- tion of the ’eGovernment Action Plan 2016-2020’ into national policies in Germany, the UK and Estonia and, on the other hand, establish this indicator as a valuable asset for evaluating and monitoring the eGovernment efforts by the EU member states.
The 11th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance (Förderkreis
Rückversicherung) on the topic of reinsurance was held 13 July 2018, in
Niederkassel near Cologne. Some 85 invited representatives of the (re)insurance
companies supporting the Sponsoring Group took part in the meeting, together with
guests. Offered for the fourth time as part of the Annual Meeting, the Researchers’
Corner gave eight members of academic staff at the Cologne Research Centre for
Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver a presentation on their respective individual
research projects.
Professor Materne also conducted interviews with Dr. Falk Niehörster (Climate Risk
Innovations) and Dr. Magnus Kobel (YAS.life). Dr. Niehörster reported on his
research and consulting activities in regard to maritime climate change and Dr. Kobel
on the business model of his InsurTec, YAS.life, and his general experience in the
establishment and development of start-ups.
In three sessions – each with 2-3 parallel lectures with posters – the most important
results of the scientific studies by the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance were
presented and discussed. The heterogeneity of the topics presented by academic
staff reflects the dovetailing of research theory with practice.
The reinsurance market is currently faced with great challenges and profound changes. Even after the large NatCat claims in Q3-2017, the substantial hardening of the reinsurance market for which reinsurers had hoped failed to materialise in the year-end renewal. Interest is now focussed on the renewal of retrocession agreements as at 1st April 2018. The Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance analyses the latest developments in the reinsurance market and, where appropriate, monitors these through research projects.
In the process, the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance links its research activities with practices in the reinsurance sector. Hereby, and facilitated through organisation of the annual Cologne Reinsurance Symposium and the Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, a bi-directional transfer of knowledge between theory and practice is pursued. The content of these two scientific events, as well as the completed research projects, are incorporated into scholarship and instruction at the Institute of Insurance Studies, rounding out practice-oriented training in the field of reinsurance. Currently, there are seven researchers and two coordinating employees on the staff of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance. Thereby, all material and personnel costs are fully financed by third-party funds provided by the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance. We want to thank the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance, the University leadership and administration, and the employees of the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance for all their support for the research projects and events of the past year.
The 10th Annual Meeting of the Sponsoring Group Reinsurance was held 7 July 2017, in Niederkassel
near Köln. Some 80 representatives of the (re)insurance companies involved in the Sponsoring Group took part in the meeting, together with invited guests. Offered for the third time as part of the Annual Meeting, the Researchers’ Corner gave nine members of academic staff at the Cologne Research Centre for Reinsurance an opportunity to deliver short presentations on their individual research projects. Professor Materne also conducted interviews with Messrs Lorenz Kielwein and
Frank Baumann. Kielwein reported on the application of mathematical systems theory to processes in change management, and Baumann on his 30 years of experience at Gothaer. During each of three sessions, three short lectures with posters were held in parallel and discussed afterwards. The heterogeneity of the topics presented by the staff members reflects the dovetailing
of research theory with practice.
In the sessions, the following speakers presented in German and English:
Round 1
a) Fabian Pütz (M.Sc.)
Alternative Capital and Basic Risk in the Standard Formula (Non-Life) of Solvency II
b) Manuel Dietmann (M.Sc.)
SFCR: Findings for Initial Publication
c) Jan Böggemann (B.Sc.)
Optimising the Purchase of Optional Reinsurance by an Industrial Insurer
Round 2
a) Robert Joniec (M.Sc.)
Actuarial swap
b) Lucas Kaiser (M.Sc.)
The Impact of Different Determinants on the Rating of Reinsurance Companies
c) Lihong Wang (M.Sc., FCII)
Chinese Automobile Vehicle Recall Insurance
Round 3
a) Sebastian Hoos (M.Sc., FCII)
Critical Analysis of the Practical Application of the Definition of an Event
b) Fabian Lassen (B.A.)
Employees in the Reinsurance Industry: Germany and the USA.
c) Kai-Olaf Knocks (M.A., FCII)
[Autonomous Driving: Evolution or Revolution?
The presentations also featured the work of another member of our staff who unfortunately, for
logistical reasons, was able to present his research project in poster form but was not able to deliver
a brief lecture.
Poster
d) Wolfgang Koch (B.A.)
Public-Private Partnership in Emerging and Developing Countries.
We would like to thank the funding bodies who make this event possible to begin with and provide our scholars an opportunity to conduct their research.